Five Radnicki 1923 scorers combine in a 5-0 win over Mladost

Radnicki 1923 defeated Mladost 5-0 at Cika Daca, with five different players scoring. Isa Ba, Mohamed Cisse, Nemanja Glavcic, David Buhta and Jovan Zivkovic shared the goals in the round-nine victory.

Two early goals broke open the match

Radnicki established a 2-0 lead inside the opening ten minutes. Isa Ba and Mohamed Cisse were the scorers, giving the home side immediate control of the result and leaving Mladost with a large deficit almost as soon as the contest had begun.

The speed of that start is essential to understanding the final score. Mladost arrived needing to compete from level terms, but the match was quickly reorganised around a two-goal Radnicki advantage. The visitors now needed a major response while also preventing the gap from growing.

Five goals came from five players

Ba and Cisse began the scoring, Nemanja Glavcic later added his name, and David Buhta and Jovan Zivkovic completed the 5-0 total. No Radnicki player needed a second goal for the home team to reach five.

That distribution gives the victory its clearest identity. The result was not carried by one forward having an exceptional scoring day. Instead, five separate finishes accumulated across the team, forcing Mladost to deal with contributions from a succession of different players.

Radnicki continued after taking control

An early 2-0 lead had already put Radnicki in a strong position, but the home side did not finish the match at that margin. Three more scorers followed, turning an excellent opening into a decisive final result at Cika Daca.

The progression from two to five matters because it shows the outcome was reinforced after the initial burst. Radnicki did not depend on the opening ten minutes remaining untouched. Their later goals removed the prospect of a Mladost recovery and widened the final difference.

A major rise in the home scoring return

Radnicki had scored seven goals across their first seven league matches. They added five in this one game, a striking increase when set beside that earlier total. The comparison does not require any projection about future form; it describes the scale of the output produced against Mladost.

The spread of scorers also made that rise more notable. Ba, Cisse, Glavcic, Buhta and Zivkovic each contributed one part of a result that was close to the club's combined scoring return from those seven earlier fixtures. This was a collective change in output within a single evening.

Mladost found no route back

Mladost were placed under pressure by the two goals conceded in the first ten minutes and never reduced the deficit. The visitors also could not stop Radnicki from adding three further goals before full time.

A reply after the opening burst might have changed the demands on both sides, but none arrived. The zero beside Mladost's name remained in place as the home total increased. That combination produced not only a defeat, but a five-goal separation in the completed score.

Cika Daca sees a complete home victory

The completed fixture left all three points in Kragujevac. Radnicki combined an immediate advantage, continued scoring and a clean sheet in one of the clearest outcomes available from a football match.

For the home side, the lasting fact is both the size and the shared nature of the win. For Mladost, the game was shaped by the damage suffered in its first ten minutes and by the absence of a goal in response. The final 5-0 records both parts of that story.

Five scorers made the winning pattern broader

Radnicki's total came from Ba, Cisse, Glavcic, Buhta and Zivkovic rather than one player repeating the same finish. That distribution matters because Mladost could not solve the match by closing one obvious source of danger. Once the early margin grew, fresh arrivals and different movements continued to produce a threat from several parts of the home side.

A wide victory can tempt a team to remember only the score, yet the more useful detail is how often an attack ended with a different player in position to finish. Radnicki can look for the movements that created those varied arrivals and decide which are repeatable against another opponent. The aim is not to expect five goals every week, but to preserve the cooperation that made several players relevant near goal.

Mladost face a more difficult review because the contest moved away quickly. Separating the goals into individual situations will be more useful than treating the entire match as one failure. The team must identify where the first danger began, how the next attack followed, and why the defensive response did not stop the sequence. Those answers provide a practical route back to a more stable performance.